There are no items in your cart
Add More
Add More
Item Details | Price |
---|
Learn Over-sampling and Under-sampling techniques to build fairer ML models.
Imagine you're building a model to detect a rare disease. Most people in your data are healthy (Class 0), and only a tiny fraction have the disease (Class 1). If you train a model on this data directly, it might become very good at predicting "healthy" simply because that's the most common case. It might achieve high accuracy but completely fail at identifying the rare, important cases!
This is the problem of imbalanced data, which is very common in real-world scenarios like fraud detection, medical diagnosis, and anomaly detection. When one class (the majority class) vastly outnumbers another (the minority class), standard models often become biased towards the majority.
Main Technical Concept: Imbalanced data refers to classification datasets where the classes are not represented equally. Standard machine learning algorithms trained on such data tend to be biased towards the majority class, leading to poor performance on the minority class. Techniques like Under-sampling and Over-sampling are used to balance the class distribution before training.
Before applying any techniques, you first need to check if your data *is* actually imbalanced. Here's how:
y
). A large difference indicates imbalance.import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from collections import Counter # Useful for counting
# --- Assume df is your loaded DataFrame ---
# --- Assume 'Class' is the name of your target variable column ---
# y = df['Class'].values # Or get y as shown previously
# 1. Using Value Counts
print("Class Distribution (Value Counts):")
target_counts = pd.Series(y).value_counts() # Convert y to Series if it's a NumPy array
print(target_counts)
# 2. Using Counter
print("\nClass Distribution (Counter):")
print(Counter(y))
# 3. Visualization
plt.figure(figsize=(6, 4))
sns.countplot(x=y)
plt.title('Class Distribution Before Balancing')
plt.xlabel('Class (0: Majority, 1: Minority)')
plt.ylabel('Count')
# plt.show() # Uncomment to display
If you see one bar vastly taller than the other(s), you have an imbalanced dataset!
There are two main approaches to fix class imbalance *before* training your model:
The `imbalanced-learn` (imblearn) library in Python provides excellent tools for both.
Under-sampling techniques work by removing instances from the majority class. The goal is to make the dataset smaller but balanced.
NearMiss
is one under-sampling algorithm. It selects majority class samples that are "close" to minority class samples, based on distance calculations. There are different versions of NearMiss controlling exactly how "closeness" is defined.
from imblearn.under_sampling import NearMiss
from collections import Counter
# --- Assume X and y are your original features and target ---
print(f"Original dataset shape: {Counter(y)}")
# Initialize NearMiss (version 3 is common)
nm = NearMiss() # You can explore different versions
# Resample the dataset
X_resampled_under, y_resampled_under = nm.fit_resample(X, y)
print(f"Resampled dataset shape (Under-sampling): {Counter(y_resampled_under)}")
print(f"New feature matrix shape: {X_resampled_under.shape}")
Under-sampling is generally considered only when the majority class is extremely large and you can afford to discard data.
Over-sampling techniques work by adding more copies or variations of the minority class instances.
from imblearn.over_sampling import RandomOverSampler
from collections import Counter
# --- Assume X and y are your original features and target ---
print(f"Original dataset shape: {Counter(y)}")
ros = RandomOverSampler(random_state=42) # random_state for reproducibility
X_resampled_ro, y_resampled_ro = ros.fit_resample(X, y)
print(f"Resampled dataset shape (Random Over-sampling): {Counter(y_resampled_ro)}")
print(f"New feature matrix shape: {X_resampled_ro.shape}")
from imblearn.over_sampling import SMOTE
from collections import Counter
# --- Assume X and y are your original features and target ---
print(f"Original dataset shape: {Counter(y)}")
smote = SMOTE(random_state=42)
X_resampled_smote, y_resampled_smote = smote.fit_resample(X, y)
print(f"Resampled dataset shape (SMOTE): {Counter(y_resampled_smote)}")
print(f"New feature matrix shape: {X_resampled_smote.shape}")
Recommendation: Over-sampling (especially SMOTE or its variations) is often preferred over under-sampling as it doesn't discard potentially useful data.
🚨 Always perform resampling techniques (Under-sampling or Over-sampling) ONLY on the TRAINING dataset *AFTER* splitting your data! 🚨
If you resample the *entire* dataset before splitting into training and testing sets, you introduce data leakage.
Your test set must always represent truly *unseen* data to get an honest evaluation of how your model will perform in the real world.
Correct Workflow:
Issue | Solution / Approach | Prevention / Best Practice |
---|---|---|
Loss of important data with under-sampling | Prefer Over-sampling (SMOTE, RandomOverSampler) if data loss is a concern. | Use under-sampling cautiously, primarily when the majority class is vast and data is abundant. |
Overfitting with Random Over-sampling | Use SMOTE or other synthetic methods (ADASYN, BorderlineSMOTE). Monitor performance carefully. | Always cross-validate after resampling. Tune model hyperparameters (e.g., regularization). |
SMOTE creates unrealistic/noisy synthetic points | Tune SMOTE parameters (e.g., `k_neighbors`). Try variants like BorderlineSMOTE or ADASYN. Consider feature selection beforehand. | Visualize data before/after SMOTE. Ensure features are appropriately scaled. |
Model evaluation metrics are misleading (e.g., high accuracy but poor minority class detection) | Use metrics appropriate for imbalanced data: Precision, Recall, F1-Score, AUC-ROC, AUC-PR. | Don't rely solely on Accuracy for imbalanced problems. Focus on minority class performance. |
Data leakage from resampling | Resample ONLY the training data after the train-test split. | Integrate resampling into a Scikit-learn Pipeline *after* the split step. |
value_counts()
or visualizations like countplot
.imbalanced-learn
library provides powerful tools for resampling.Interview Question
Question 1: What is imbalanced data in a classification context, and why is it a problem for machine learning models?
Imbalanced data refers to datasets where the number of instances belonging to one class (majority class) is significantly higher than the number of instances belonging to other classes (minority classes). It's a problem because standard ML algorithms aim to minimize overall error, often leading them to become biased towards predicting the majority class well while performing poorly on predicting the rare but often important minority class.
Question 2: Describe the main difference between under-sampling and over-sampling.
Under-sampling reduces the size of the dataset by removing instances from the majority class to match the minority class count.
Over-sampling increases the size of the dataset by adding copies or synthetic versions of instances from the minority class to match the majority class count.
Interview Question
Question 3: What is SMOTE, and how does it differ from simple Random Over-Sampling?
SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling TEchnique) is an over-sampling method. Unlike Random Over-Sampling, which simply duplicates existing minority samples, SMOTE creates new, synthetic minority samples. It does this by selecting a minority sample, finding its nearest minority neighbors, and generating a new sample along the line segment connecting the original sample to one of its neighbors. This often leads to better generalization and less overfitting compared to random duplication.
Question 4: Why is it critically important to perform resampling (like SMOTE or NearMiss) *after* splitting the data into training and testing sets?
Performing resampling before splitting causes data leakage. If you over-sample before splitting, identical or synthetic copies of minority samples can end up in both the training and test sets, making the test set no longer representative of unseen data and leading to overly optimistic performance evaluation. If you under-sample before splitting, the test set distribution is altered based on information (implicitly) from the training set. The test set must remain untouched and representative of the original data distribution to get a valid estimate of the model's real-world performance.
Interview Question
Question 5: If accuracy is high on an imbalanced dataset, why might it be a misleading metric? What other metrics should you consider?
High accuracy can be misleading because a model might achieve it simply by always predicting the majority class. For example, if 99% of data is Class 0, a model predicting Class 0 every time gets 99% accuracy but is useless for identifying Class 1. Better metrics to consider include:
- Precision: Of the instances predicted as positive, how many actually were? (TP / (TP + FP))
- Recall (Sensitivity): Of all the actual positive instances, how many did the model correctly identify? (TP / (TP + FN))
- F1-Score: The harmonic mean of Precision and Recall (good balance between them).
- AUC-ROC: Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (measures ability to distinguish between classes).
- AUC-PR: Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (often more informative than ROC AUC for highly imbalanced data).